Day of the Daleks
|
(Doctor Who Story No. 60, starring Jon Pertwee)
|
In-Depth Analysis Reviewby Martin Izsak |
WARNING: This review contains "SPOILERS", and is intended for those who have already seen the program. To avoid the spoilers, read the Buyers Guide version instead. |
Jon Pertwee has every right to regard the Daleks as being the most
boring Doctor Who villains. Although I tend to disagree with him in
general, his own era boasts four of the most uninspiring Dalek productions
of all time.
"Day of the Daleks" however is a bit of an exception. It has by far the most intriguing plot of any Pertwee Dalek story, and is largely a success because of it. The producers actually grafted the Daleks onto its good script at the last minute, which was a logical move on their part that should have worked. As far as the 1972 version is concerned though, the Daleks themselves turned out to be the weakest part of the production, both poorly directed and poorly voiced.
All that may be changing though, thanks to a new 2011 version. Will it be able to turn the tables on the production, and breathe new life into what was essentially a fascinating story? There is much that it would need to try and tackle....
Both the action sequences and the Daleks suffer the most. Many scenes are just not blocked out well enough to believably hide the protagonists from searching Ogrons, be it in the corridors or on the grassy knoll. There are too few close ups of Boaz during his final heroics, and what we do get isn't linked well into the long shots, leaving the audience confused when they should be emotionally engaged.
Once again, the leading Dalek gets the frailest sounding "Granny" voice and too much unnatural pausing between syllables. Now that the Daleks' TV adventures are in colour, the old full screen negative effect for their weapons' blast is really outdated. Far from making any improvements, we get it in slow motion with hammy acting from the victims, making it absurdly silly.
Topping it all off is the
ridiculous handling of the Dalek numbers. The BBC only has three Daleks
at this point, and one has been painted gold to represent the leader.
That leaves only two blue Daleks to represent the hordes. Cutting away from
the tunnel and back as the same two blue Daleks emerge over and over again
with different arrangements of Ogron support is predictable, yet still
effective. It's in fact the only effective part of the Dalek Horde
sequence. Paul Bernard gives the game away time and again afterwards by
always grouping the three Daleks together and showing lots of empty space
around them in the long shots. Where are all those other blue Daleks
that aren't supposed to be so close to the one and only Gold Dalek?
We need to cut in
shots of blue Daleks all over the place one after the other to maintain
the effect. Important: Do not put the gold Dalek in every shot, or the game
is up once more! And the high long shot needs to be an inlay composite
showing something like ten blue Daleks, but only one gold, to be of
any use at all. Can't do an inlay composite due to time and money?
Fine, then just don't do the long shot at all. It isn't worth having if
it's going to destroy the illusion of lots of Daleks.
Dudley Simpson's music is not great this time around, not composed well enough to elicit much emotion from the audience, and not performed on a great choice of instruments either, electronic or otherwise. But at least it is somewhat thematic and therefore, somewhat memorable.
Episode two has a questionable act from the perspective of the Doctor's character. He escapes from the house, captured ray gun in hand, and rounds the corner to find two Ogrons out for a leisurely stroll. It's his first encounter with the creatures in the entire story, he still hasn't really found out who's who from the rebels yet, and thanks to Paul Bernard's direction, the Ogrons appear quite pleasant and non-threatening. The good Doctor then raises the ray gun and disintegrates one of them in cold blood. Nice first contact policy, Doc! If ever the Valeyard wanted good evidence to convict the Doctor of meddling and interference, this incident would make a most damning case! Keeping the Ogrons stupid and useless, the other Ogron fails to react to the fact that his comrade is no more, and would happily continue walking to the same fate like a lemming if the Brigadier hadn't shown up and beaten the Doctor to the draw.
"Day of the Daleks" gets good and interesting by episode three. The old prisoner dynamic pops up, but is kept to the barest of minimums, only used as a vehicle for exposition of a few important human characters of the era. That single scene in the Doctor's cell holds a lot of excellent dramatic meat, and completes the range for many of the characters. The Doctor redeems himself from his ray gun fiasco by taking on the Controller head on in philosophy, and getting his position absolutely right on.
I will give the temporal paradox here the same nod of approval that I give to the eighth Star Trek feature film "First Contact", which is that the events we see are all technically okay, while the characters are allowed to have incorrect theories about what is going on. In fact, "Day of the Daleks" holds up a bit better, because there really is no Commander Data babbling away the wrong idea to the audience unobstructed. Here it is interesting to note that the Doctor appears to have embraced what he learned in "Inferno" (story no. 54), that an infinity of parallel timelines exists, allowing free will, and to use his own words, "the pattern can be changed". (In my own words, it is important to say "the pattern can be chosen" instead, as none of the various timeline options actually change.) Anyway, gone is the old conviction of not being able to affect outcomes that plagued the Doctor in the Hartnell era, in stories like "The Aztecs" (story no. 6) and "The Massacre" (story no. 22), and the Doctor is definitely a more enjoyable and heroic character here as a result.
An added bonus here is that the metaphysical aspects of people creating their own reality is made very tangible as well. Violence begets violence, and as the rebels try to use it to gain their own ends, so they discover that it is precisely what dooms them to a violent fate. Beautiful touch.
"Day of the Daleks" ends on a powerful note of choice, in the present day, making a firm stand for proactive peace instead of reactive violence. (Something it might not have done so well if the story had ended on the other half of the time loop in the Doctor's lab.) All the more power to it. Most thankfully, it does not attempt to show any magical change sweeping across the future as happens in so many Star Trek fantasies. The "Brannon Braga Disney-Wand" has no jurisdiction here. We don't have to pretend that the timelines all rotate around whatever a few time travellers may do, we can perceive those travellers simply navigating their own tiny routes around and through the timelines instead. The pro-peace timeline shown at the end does not wipe out the one of world war and Dalek invasion, but is allowed to co-exist with it. The Doctor and friends simply choose their way into it, as naturally and believably as you please.
And so, this latest society of Anat and Monia's 22nd century Earth has a new Controller, and a new Gold Dalek is likely to arrive from Skaro at his earliest convenience, but that's about it for now. For although the Doctor and all his friends in the 20th century have chosen their way onto a new time-line, it co-exists with the old one, and Anat and Monia are still on that old one. They would need a "sliding" machine or an "Inferno"-style accident with a time machine to get onto the time-line that results from the Doctor and friends choosing a different version of their history. Anat and Monia still have choices they can make to free their world, but their choices are in their present, not their past. Had they time traveled with the Doctor, made their choices, and time traveled forward again, they might have been able to arrive in the world they struggled to achieve, however their old world would still be occupied, and they would merely have abandoned it, and become considered lost or disintegrated. And the Daleks might still invade the new world they arrive on, bombarding the planet with meteors if the humans are too united to decimate themselves, as happened in the 2164 timeline that William Hartnell's Doctor visited, or the 2150 timeline that Peter Cushing's Doctor visited. Anyway you slice it, a better key to getting rid of 22nd century Daleks is to use the Earth's magnetic core against them, as Sir Ian Chesterton of Coal Hill can attest to. ;-)
Some reports indicate that it could have led to an attempt at something that mirrors the plot of "Day of the Daleks", and thus might be an interesting read for Doctor Who fans. While we will present a good chunk more detail in our article on The Philadelphia Experiment, the basics are that an early version of stealth technology involving electromagnetism was being tested on the USS Eldridge during World War II to hopefully make it invisible to radar and/or the naked eye, and it was discovered that these powerful magnetic fields could actually punch holes in space/time. However, they found out the hard way that much more research into the human mind and its electromagnetic properties was needed before people could safely exist in or pass through these fields. As the story goes, the Philadelphia research eventually combined with mind amplification research until a way was discovered to create a vortex connecting two points in space time and send people back and forth.
There is a fairly long document created by Valdamar Valerian multiplying itself over the internet in whole and in part, which gives a lot of insight into this subject. It was reportedly "constructed from over 9 hours of video interviews, personal interviews and individual commentary". I had intended to quote several passages here, but I discovered in my research quite by accident that I actually had in my possession the 2-hour video interview from which the earliest parts of Valerian's document were made. So why not depart from the rest of the internet and quote the actual source instead? The video has no proper title known to me; it looks like a homemade camcorder video from 1989 would, with 3 interviewees in a living room answering questions from about 5 or 6 audience members. Here are some excerpts from my own more detailed transcription:
|
Preston Nichols: "First of all, this transmitter was so freaking powerful;
this transmitter had enough power to warp space and time.
"You're talking gigawatts, in the etheric power probably many many terawatts. You're talking astronomical etheric power. They're using multiple pulse modulators: pulse modulating amplifiers on top of pulse modulating amplifiers, opening different windows and driving this end to that end, and you can encode all sorts of zero-point functions as you go through what they call the amplidyne function. I don't think I can overstate how much power... as far as we're concerned in this room, it's astronomical power this thing had. This thing literally had, if the target, if the person who was sitting in the chair thought of a time warp and a vortex, that vortex would form. "They would put into Duncan's mind when he's in a trance, what they want him to think of... The chair would pick it up. ...his thoughts were channeled directly through the transmitter.... "Next bright idea they got was, okay, let's tell Duncan to think of a vortex connecting, ahh..., 1981 to 1947. He would do this for them. What happened? They got a vortex going from 1981 to 1947 you could walk through."
Nichols: "No comment." Audience: "Do you know anybody that did...?" Nichols: "Oh yes." Audience: "Could you describe at least the experience?" Nichols: "Ahhh... Al." Al Bielek: "I can. I did more than once. And it's... it's weird..." (smiles, audience chuckles) "...to say the least." Audience: "So what was it like, Al? You were saying..." Al Bielek: "It's like looking into the entrance of a peculiar spiral tunnel which was lit all the way down. You would start to walk into this thing, and then suddenly you'd be pulled down it. You'd more or less be projected. You didn't walk through it as such. You were more or less propelled through it." Audience: "You walked into it." Bielek: "You walked into it, correct, to start. Then you were propelled down the thing like some force grabbed you and pulled you through, and you come out the other end wherever it is. You could be far in the past; you could be in the future. You could be very close by, and it could definitely be another place physically other than the point where you started, and usually was. "It was corkscrew, and it would not go in a straight line either, it would take some very strange turns, which I could not explain. But it did take turns, and you would come out at the other end, wherever you were supposed to come out. And meet somebody or do something at the other point." Audience: "Did you have like a mission?" Bielek: "Yes. And you would return. Whenever whatever you were doing was completed, the tunnel would re-open for you, and you go in the other direction, you walk back in it, and go back from wherever you came from." |
Valerian's document contains some sections later on that begin to resemble
the plot of "Day of the Daleks" - unfortunately, he deliberately left
out any reference to whom he was quoting... or paraphrasing as often
seems to be the case. This is particularly frustrating when contradicting
ideas are presented.
Nevertheless, note these sections:
|
The Navy had the ability to use the time travel technology from about 1970 and developed full operational capability in 1973. They did do an experiment where they tried to go back and kill the father of the man destined to be the head of the new One-World government. They did kill his father, but it made no difference. They didn't understand why it didn't work.
|
|
What is another possibility as to why the death of the father of the One World government failed to produce the dematerialization of the future leader of the One World government? This seeming paradox can be better explained this way: The people who went back and tried to kill the father were successful but the son still lived. This is all related to the Grandfather Paradox. The truth of the matter is that they prevented the birth of the leader of the One World government not in the time stream where the existing person was born but in a parallel one where he never existed in the first place. It existed before and after the effort to kill the father; the parallel time stream also exists where the Germans overtly won the second world war. There are differing but parallel interrelated worlds and universes, each having an endless number of streams relating to individual entities..... |
Atrocious stuff, this assassination bit, but the irony that made me
laugh was the difficulty that the perpetrators had
to understand what it was all about - that they could not sit
back in their time-travel control room, send others through time to do
their dirty work, and watch some magic wand of time swoop by and erase
their arch-enemies from existance. They might have been able to keep
the far end of their time-tunnel-vortex locked onto their assassin no matter
which time-line he chose himself into, but when they bring him back to
their end, it is still back into the same time-line as before, one
with a living breathing future leader of a new One-world government.
For more on this subject, and links to some of the existing copies of Valerian's document, see our article on "The Philadelphia Experiment".
Final word: "Day of the Daleks" had poor Daleks and
uninspired directing (which the 2011 special edition may somewhat fix
and overcome), but is thankfully based on a gripping and worthwhile
time-paradox story. This one deserves to be revisited and
celebrated.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| DVD NTSC Region 1
for the North American market:
|
DVD PAL Region 2
|
VHS Video
NTSC A
NTSC B
NTSC
PAL
|
LYRATEK.COM |
|