In-Depth Analysis Reviewby Martin Izsak |
WARNING: This review contains "SPOILERS", and is intended for those who have already seen the program. To avoid the spoilers, read the Buyers' Guide version instead. |
This story marks a distinct shift in style for Doctor Who,
consciously
aimed for by incoming producer Philip Hinchcliffe.
The drama is tighter,
returning to the level of sophisticatation and seriousness that Barry Letts
and Terrance Dicks had originally achieved at the beginning of their era
and later forgotten nearer its end. But the show also now has a lonelier,
more claustrophobic, more disturbing feel to it. For this story, it works
wonderfully, as "The Ark in Space" becomes one of the two stand-out gems
of the twelfth season.
Firstly, the experimental colour tinting on the first episode's titles
are a lot of fun. I wish they'd tried a few more tints on various episodes
in later seasons, just to give us some variety and make things less
predictable.
Then there are the opening shots in space, which the DVD gives us two versions of. I must say, firstly, that I always liked the original ones. They are much bolder, fresher, more exciting, and crisper than any other space model work done in Doctor Who up until that point in 1974. CSO was made for compositing space objects on starry backgrounds, as far as I'm concerned. It's the way it should be done. The composition of the first shot is satisfyingly bold, carefully guiding separate cameras by hand where computers would automatically sync things up today, all to combine three elements and get them artistically just right to tell the story. Top marks for visual literacy.
That said, the new CGI shots are lovely too. More attention to "reality" detail is paid to the space station and its shuttlecraft, in terms of how it orbits the earth, when it should have its lights on and when not, etc. The visual literacy of the shots is a bit different, showing more of the earth than before, and not focusing on the station quite as selectively anymore. Here in the opening, things still work.
What disappoints me is that, while they took the time to fix what ain't broke, they did nothing for the shot that had severe problems. "Robot" (the preceding story) has done little so far to acquaint new audiences with the TARDIS or the space-time travel capabilities that our main characters of this show have at their disposal, and "The Ark in Space" now does even less, doing the materialization of the TARDIS so badly on the cheap that fresh audiences may well still be confused. The lack of a nice visual trick cross-dissolve is extremely irksome - visually illiterate as I like to put it. The subsequent dialogue aims for a kind of attitude humour, but still doesn't inform us as to what exactly has Harry so amazed.
The three regular characters proceed to carry the first episode all on their own, and do a remarkably fine job of it. In many ways, it is reminiscent of "The Edge of Destruction" (story no. 3), a pause in the heavily populated adventures to give the regulars time to define their characters and relationships with each other, and this time there really is an intruding presence creeping about with them in the confined space they get to explore. The new Doctor and Harry get the best of this, and as a whole the episode and story work far better than was managed back in "Edge of Destruction".
The sets by Roger Murray-Leach are really wonderful, helping to set the story apart from the usual outer space boxes seen previously on the program. It's doubly nice that the sets got re-used again in the final story of the season.
Blake's 7 fans like myself will enjoy Peter Tuddenham's voice-overs in the first episode. Even though his roles on Blake's 7 were a few years away, Tuddenham seems quite like "Zen" over Sarah's cryogenic scene, and very like "Orac" in the hall with the Doctor and Harry.
|
Dudley Simpson continues to be
refreshingly creative this season.
His cues seem more thematic and more carefully worked out than usual.
He does some really excellent atmospheric work for creeping-about scenes,
and he does a particularly memorable theme for the story that can serve
as both a suspenseful tension builder and a purposeful march. (It's a pity
that this bit wasn't included on the Heathcliffe Blair CD that featured
music from this story.) Perhaps
most important of all are the beginnings of Simpson's incidental theme for
Tom Baker's Doctor, which finds its way into two major cues throughout
the story. Unfortunately, a lot of Simpson's best work for this story
remains masked under a lot of dialogue, where it is forced to remain
low key in the mix and perhaps not get the notice that it deserves
without many repeat viewings.
Some wonderfully soothing classical music by Händel also fits in to become another musical highlight of the story. This story marks a rich day, musically speaking.
|
|
Further on, the Graham Williams years (seasons 15-17) would tip the sci-fi scale in the other direction, more towards humour and fantasy, where one can escape to a fun place with colourful light-hearted effects, and fill the moral commentary on society with irony and satire. To be quite frank, more my own personal cup of tea. And lastly, the John Nathan-Turner years (seasons 18-26) seem to return to the centre of balance in my idea of sci-fi, where an additional push was made to give it all a big blockbuster, sequels-to-outdo-originals type of feel, a push that eventually overshadowed the sci-fi elements altogether but still gave us lots of great fun stuff.
"The Ark in Space" really is a bold statement of the way Hinchcliffe and Holmes wanted to do things, and the change in atmosphere really is quite palpable. It's a riveting bottle-story, well-paced, and superbly delivered by the actors. Tom Baker finds himself in his new role, and Ian Marter finally gets lots of screen time to demonstrate how exceptionally good he is in his role. Elisabeth Sladen has less to do as Sarah, but still does it all extremely well. Richardson Morgan is great as Rogin, the one futuristic "awakened-human" character who seems to still have wit and emotional depth. Morgan was also very entertaining as Corporal Blake in the 1967 Pat Troughton story "The Web of Fear" (story no. 41). Wendy Williams plays Vira with a certain futuristic distance in her mannerisms, aiding that early sense of uncertainty as to whether the chief threat against the Doctor's party will come from the awakened humans themselves, caught in the grip of the automization and purification of their culture, or some other unknown..... As Noah, Kenton Moore has to continue to pull off that dichotomy all the way through, and he does a remarkable job of it. They say Tom Baker was unpredictable in humourous ways, which was probably true, but so were Noah and Vira in dramatic ways as characters, which fuels so much of this story's power.
Many of the effects are limited, but director Rodney Bennett seems extremely expert in knowing what to do with what he gets. The "line-of-fire" visible beams that I always want to see aren't there, but particularly with the battles involving the "heavier artillery" of the fission guns, the fast-editing, close-ups, powerful sound effects, and visuals of sparks around the targets and interesting working props all combine to deliver a wonderful and absolutely essential energy to the drama. I love those sequences. They work, and with a different variety of cinematic ingredients than the usual sci-fi pallette. It's so much better than much of what Doctor Who had been offering us previously in terms of fire-fights. It keeps the drama moving as it should, which Bennett has done a remarkable job on as a whole.
Once more, Holmes allows the Doctor to be upstaged for the final climactic heroic act, in this case making it necessary for his survival. It's the Doctor's plan, but Rogin knocks him out and does it himself, and it is Noah who ensures that the plan is a permanent solution and not just a temporary one. Not all I might have hoped for, but Tom's Doctor has been quite a bit busier than his predecessor recently in solving problems and doing heroic deeds all through the story, so it doesn't reflect badly on him. Also, it maintains that sense of horrific wonder, as each member of the audience can ask themselves what character strengths they might have shown in Noah's shoes, or in Rogin's. Quite nicely, the Doctor can perhaps take some credit for convincing Noah to act on behalf of humanity.
In the end, the Wirrn's demise is handled visually by a single shot of the shuttle exploding. Again, two versions. Although I like the marvelous detail of the new CGI shot, and can marvel at the ingenuity and beauty of it on its own, I think, all nostalgia for the ground-breaking of the original shots aside, this is one example where the old original shot served the story better. It's all to do with timing and size. Sure, you can't even see the shuttle in the old shot - they probably didn't even have an element of it in the composite, but that means that the shuttle must have been extremely far away and therefore small compared to the size of the explosion. Also, during the second half of the shot, the explosion is over, and we see a lot of empty silent space. This all aids the idea that the Wirrn were completely wiped out, and that life is now back to peace and tranquility again. The CGI shot takes exactly the same short amount of time to go only half way with the ideas. We now see the shuttle clearly in all its glory, and we see a much smaller explosion by comparison, which rather embarrassingly leaves great pieces of the shuttle still floating around intact. After seeing how resilient the Wirrn were all through the story, it's now too easy for me to think that many of them probably survived the explosion, and are at liberty to fly back to the Ark when they please. And I also now wonder how much bang one should expect just from forgetting to "set the stabiliser"? Unless of course the shuttle was flying on automatic into Earth's atmosphere, which doesn't come across on either version of the final shot. It seems more like it's escaping Earth's orbit altogether.
Here comes another big plus for the story: Trans-mat finally comes of age. They may have screwed up with the TARDIS effects, but for the first time in the history of the show, Doctor Who's version of Star Trek's "beam-me-up" transporter is done to satisfaction with a proper trick-dissolve. Trans-mat features quite a bit in this story, and is nicely integral to the link to the next stories. I am disappointed, however that Trans-mat took over from the TARDIS as the main vehicle moving our main characters from one story's setting to the next; I think an interesting move like that would be more appropriate for a new Doctor's second season than his first, again in the interests of "piloting" the show to new audiences and doing the TARDIS right first until it is a better established familiarity.
Ian Marter, God bless him, made a wonderful and critically more logical improvement on it in his novelisation of this story and the next: if the transmat is not working so well, why use it to get to the problem on the other end, when the TARDIS is sitting right there begging to be the hero? Marter's version uses it, and concocts a technical reason for it abandoning the trio on Earth to return to the Ark. This heightens the sense of them being trapped on Earth, because it would show that they're not willing to trust the transmat until after the Doctor has finished fixing it, and it also provides a reason for the TARDIS to be in motion to return to the Ark in the appropriate time period for "Revenge of the Cybermen" (story no. 79), rather than having us believe that after it was just sitting there after "The Ark in Space" it spontaneously decided to get up and shift back through time. So.... three cheers for Ian Marter, and too bad he wasn't quick enough with that one to get it into the filming and taping of the season.
Bottom line: Ark in Space is a good one! The DVD's got great
extras on top. Enjoy! :-)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| DVD NTSC Region 1 for the North American market:
|
DVD PAL Region 2
|
VHS Video
NTSC
NTSC
PAL
|
LYRATEK.COM |
|